Chat Room
Go Back   The Bear Insider - Covering Cal Sports 24 x 7 > The Public Place where "CyberBears" Growl > Men's Basketball
Reload this Page Allen Crabbe vs Harrison Barnes ... stats comparison
Notices
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  (#1) Old
MiZery MiZery is online now
Real Bear
 
Posts: 2,462
Join Date: Jul 2008
Allen Crabbe vs Harrison Barnes ... stats comparison - 02-10-2011, 10:24 AM

Some sites had Harrison Barnes as the #1 rated HS recruit last year. His freshman year #'s are very similiar to Crabbe.

Barnes 13.1 PPG, 1.4 APG, 34% 3's, 5.5 RPG, 0.4 BPG, 0.6 SPG, 41% 2's, 1,15 points per shot

Allen Crabbe 12.4 PPG, 1.9 APG, 38% 3's, 5.7 RPG, 0.5 BPG, 0.9 SPG, 42% 2's, 1.31 points per shot

Their numbers are nearly identical accross the board, but Crabbe has a higher Points per shot number. Yet Barnes was the more highly rated out of the two recruits.
Reply With Quote
  (#2) Old
grandmastapoop grandmastapoop is online now
Golden Bear
 
Posts: 7,222
Join Date: Jul 2008
02-10-2011, 10:55 AM

Interesting. After reading your post, I wondered how they compared in conference play. I had read that Barnes was becoming more effective, and I know Crabbe has. Here's how it breaks down per game:

Crabbe (10 Games):
5.7FGM 12.8FGA (44.5%), 4.3FTM 5.4FTA (79.6%), 2.6 3PTM 5.7 3PTA (45.6%), 18.3PPG, 6.8 RPG, 2.1 APG, 1.6 TOPG, .8 SPG, .2 BPG.

Barnes (9 Games):
5.44 FGM 11.89 FGA (45.8%), 2.44 FTM 3.33 FTA (73%), 1.67 3PTM 4.33 3PTA (38.5%), 15 PPG, 5.33 RPG, 0.77 APG, 2.22 TOPG, 0.33 SPG, 0.56 BPG

As you can see, Crabbe leads in almost every category.
Reply With Quote
  (#3) Old
SleepyBear07 SleepyBear07 is offline
Real Bear
 
SleepyBear07's Avatar
 
Posts: 1,408
Join Date: Jul 2008
02-10-2011, 11:42 AM

Quote:
Originally Posted by grandmastapoop View Post
Interesting. After reading your post, I wondered how they compared in conference play. I had read that Barnes was becoming more effective, and I know Crabbe has. Here's how it breaks down per game:

Crabbe (10 Games):
5.7FGM 12.8FGA (44.5%), 4.3FTM 5.4FTA (79.6%), 2.6 3PTM 5.7 3PTA (45.6%), 18.3PPG, 6.8 RPG, 2.1 APG, 1.6 TOPG, .8 SPG, .2 BPG.

Barnes (9 Games):
5.44 FGM 11.89 FGA (45.8%), 2.44 FTM 3.33 FTA (73%), 1.67 3PTM 4.33 3PTA (38.5%), 15 PPG, 5.33 RPG, 0.77 APG, 2.22 TOPG, 0.33 SPG, 0.56 BPG

As you can see, Crabbe leads in almost every category.
Crabbe plays a lot more minutes though (38 per game in conference play vs. 27 for Barnes). Adjusted to 30 minutes, their numbers are:

Crabbe: 13.1 points, 4.9 rebounds, 1.5 assists, 1.1 turnovers, 0.6 steals, 0.1 blocks

Barnes: 16.7 points, 5.9 rebounds, 0.9 assists, 2.5 turnovers, 0.4 steals, 0.6 blocks

Of course, Crabbe continues to be a better free throw and 3-point shooter.
Reply With Quote
  (#4) Old
SouthBayPhenom SouthBayPhenom is offline
Real Bear
 
Posts: 1,739
Join Date: Aug 2008
02-10-2011, 03:56 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by SleepyBear07 View Post
Crabbe plays a lot more minutes though (38 per game in conference play vs. 27 for Barnes). Adjusted to 30 minutes, their numbers are:

Crabbe: 13.1 points, 4.9 rebounds, 1.5 assists, 1.1 turnovers, 0.6 steals, 0.1 blocks

Barnes: 16.7 points, 5.9 rebounds, 0.9 assists, 2.5 turnovers, 0.4 steals, 0.6 blocks

Of course, Crabbe continues to be a better free throw and 3-point shooter.
That's because Barnes isn't in as good a shape as Crabbe - he gets tired too quickly.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Forum Jump




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
vBulletin Skin developed by: vBStyles.com
Ad Management by RedTyger