Chat Room
Go Back   The Bear Insider - Covering Cal Sports 24 x 7 > The Public Place where "CyberBears" Growl > Football
Reload this Page Stanford Football: Still on Steroids; Magic Glove Not So Magic Afterall
Notices
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  (#1) Old
grandmastapoop grandmastapoop is offline
Golden Bear
 
Posts: 7,476
Join Date: Jul 2008
Stanford Football: Still on Steroids; Magic Glove Not So Magic Afterall - 09-12-2012, 09:56 PM

http://www.slate.com/articles/techno...t_.single.html
Reply With Quote
  (#2) Old
Big C_Cal Big C_Cal is offline
Loyal Bear
 
Posts: 3,612
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Bay Area
09-12-2012, 10:21 PM

Not surprised. Those bastards...

Maybe "the glove" was part of a diversion plan to take the attention away from the 'roids.

October 20th. The date sounds all weird, but let's get 'em!
Go Bears!
Reply With Quote
  (#3) Old
prospeCt prospeCt is offline
Real Bear
 
prospeCt's Avatar
 
Posts: 1,693
Join Date: Mar 2009
09-13-2012, 06:41 AM

pas surprise

rockOn* with yer bear self




http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NsBBuGJaDNM






















Last edited by prospeCt; 09-13-2012 at 07:10 AM.
Reply With Quote
  (#4) Old
82gradDLSdad 82gradDLSdad is offline
Loyal Bear
 
82gradDLSdad's Avatar
 
Posts: 3,709
Join Date: Jul 2008
Maybe the magic glove works like magic diet pills - 09-13-2012, 07:16 AM

"Take this diet pill* and you will lose weight"











* and go on a low calorie diet.


"Use this magic freezing glove* and you will increase athletic performance"







* and get a steroid injection
Reply With Quote
  (#5) Old
calumnus calumnus is offline
True Blue Golden Bear
 
Posts: 12,401
Join Date: Jul 2008
09-13-2012, 07:54 AM

Quote:
Originally Posted by grandmastapoop View Post
When it comes to all things Stanfrod--Don't believe the hype!

The glove is typical Stanfrod, they were/are pretty obviously roiding.

I see pictures of our linemen and we are pretty obviously not. But with the new SAHPC we will get it done the old fashion with hard work.
Reply With Quote
  (#6) Old
HaasBear04 HaasBear04 is offline
Loyal Bear
 
HaasBear04's Avatar
 
Posts: 4,035
Join Date: Jul 2008
09-13-2012, 08:02 AM

Is Nevada roiding too?
Reply With Quote
  (#7) Old
manus manus is offline
Real Bear
 
manus's Avatar
 
Posts: 2,414
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Near the Lassen Trail
09-13-2012, 08:36 AM

Ho-hum.
Reply With Quote
  (#8) Old
wifeisafurd wifeisafurd is offline
Golden Bear
 
Posts: 6,943
Join Date: Jul 2008
Who had the bigger line again? - 09-13-2012, 08:39 AM

Let's look at last year (this year there still is movement in who plays what):

Mitch S. vs Martin Mitch bigger and stronger per NFL combines
Galas vs Schwartstein both undersized, Galas weighs more
Schwenke vs DeCastro Decastro has an inch, Schwenke a few pounds
MSG vs Mabry Mabry is taller,, MSG more weight (a few pounds)
Cheadle vs Wilkes/Danzer Cheadle is bigger than Wilkes, Danzer taller, weights about the same
Fleener and Ertz are tall, but like 245 lbs. The new TEs are all like 6'7" or more, and came into the program huge.

The Furd guys I have wondered about are at fullback, and a certain linebacker prone to losing his temper and getting suspended.

Cal, under a different regime, was smaller. They are not smaller any more.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Forum Jump




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
vBulletin Skin developed by: vBStyles.com
Ad Management by RedTyger